There seems to be some confusion at this point whether the Irreconcilable Differences (“ID”) cause of action enacted for divorce in marriages would also apply to dissolution of Civil Unions. The ID bill was introduced before the Lewis v. Harris decision came down and before the legislature considered the Civil Unions bill. In essence, the two bills crossed during their passage. Obviously, under Lewis the court directed the government to make same sex unions legally equal (at least under state law) to marriage. The Governor in his statement accompany the signing of the ID bill said he was assured this would apply to civil unions. It seems that the legislature will need to enact a techincal correction or the courts will have to enforce this for civil unions. If it’s the former, they have a bit of time to enact it since civil unions will not come into effect until mid February and the ID has a six month tail.
Recent Blog Posts
- In NJ, What is the Effect of an Unenforceable Clause in an Agreement to Arbitrate?
- Conflict Quote — Carl Rogers
- New in the US Tax Code: No deduction for Sexual Harassment Settlements with Non-Disclosure Clauses
- Top 10 Read Posts on the Blog in 2017
- NCAA Basketball Referee Doesn’t Understand De-escalation
ADR Blog Categories
$54 million dollar lawsuit Arbitration baseball civil union cleaner Commercial Mediation confidentiality conflict of interest consumer consumer fraud act credit card disappearing trial Disaster Mediation discovery divorce employment discrimination entrepreneurs FINRA FINRA arbitration foreclosure harness racing horse racing irreconciliable differences judge labor talks LAD law against discrimination law degree lawsuit litigation manure mediation mediation medical malpractice mortgage Negotiation NFL pre-litigation risk Roy Pearson settlement sexual harassment Sexual Orientation Discrimination tort trial Willingboro Mall